Critics of the Trump administration’s immigration policies raised alarm Tuesday over a so-called “surge” of park rangers that the Interior Department is deploying to patrol the U.S.-Mexico border as House Democrats refuse to fund President Donald Trump’s long-promised border wall.
Valerie Naylor, a former National Park Service (NPS) superintendent who worked for the agency for over three decades, expressed worries about rangers arresting migrants crossing the border rather than protecting public lands.
“My concern is sending rangers from parks that are already understaffed specifically to work with border patrol in areas that are outside the mission of the National Park Service,” Naylor told The Guardian. “This potentially puts visitors at risk, certainly resources at risk, in the parks they are leaving.”
NPS has sent rangers from the Great Smoky Mountains National Park in North Carolina, Wrangell-St. Elias National Park in Alaska, the National Mall in Washington, and Zion National Park in Utah—and other sites—to work with border agents in Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge in Arizona as well as Big Bend National Park in Texas, USA Today reported last month. The deployments are expected to continue through at least September 2020.
Laiken Jordahl, a campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) and former NPS contractor, pointed out to The Guardian that “this is coming at a time when national parks are experiencing the most significant staff and funding shortages in American history.” He warned, “It’s a publicity stunt with genuine consequences.”
Environmental justice reporter Yessenia Funes offered similar criticism of the administration sending park rangers to the borderlands in a piece for EARTHER.
“This type of action not only threatens the public lands these park rangers were hired to protect; it also threatens the Department of Interior’s efforts to help diversify visitors to national parks and other lands,” she wrote. “Making park rangers, in essence, border patrol officers erodes the trust the agency has attempted to build with immigrant communities—especially Latinx families.”
Funes added that the operation “isn’t surprising” considering that “this is the same administration that is using public lands within the Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument to construct an ugly ass wall along the border in Arizona. In doing so, contractors have bulldozed saguaro cacti, destroyed a precious desert ecosystem, and put archeological sites at-risk.”
Although arguably an unsurprising move by the administration, advocates for immigrants and the environment remain upset by the decision to effectively turn some park rangers into border patrol agents. As Aaron Weiss, deputy director of the Center for Western Priorities, told Funes: “That’s not what park rangers signed up for. That’s not why we trust park rangers. So it does send a dangerous and confusing message even for the rangers who aren’t being sent to the border.”
As High Country News reported in May, the administration’s effort started as
Zinke left his position early this year, under a cloud of ethics violation investigations. High Country News noted in May that “so far, the department has been tight-lipped about the program’s details, including the cost of deployments, the work being done and any future plans.” That remains true.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT